KNEE-JERK REACTION | Harry Potter HBO & Snape: Why Paapa Essiedu Can Be Different

OK. I think Paapa Essiedu’s Severus Snape just gave me the best creative reason yet for HBO’s Harry Potter to exist.

The new trailer gives us plenty of recognizable Potter material to chew on. Hogwarts feels warmer and more alive, we get Quidditch, the Sorting Hat, the Mirror of Erised, Wizard’s Chess, the troll, Quirrell and much more of Harry’s actual life at school. I like a lot of what I am seeing, especially the sense that HBO is interested in letting Harry spend time at Hogwarts rather than racing from famous scene to famous scene.

But Snape is the thing I cannot stop thinking about, because Paapa Essiedu has an opportunity Alan Rickman never really had. Most of us already know why Severus Snape does what he does. We know about Lily. We know about James. We know what Harry means to him long before Harry understands any of it.

That means HBO can build its new Snape around dramatic irony from the very beginning, allowing Harry to experience one version of this man while the audience watches an entirely different emotional story moving underneath him. That, more than additional runtime or restored book scenes, may be the most compelling reason to tell Harry Potter again.

This Week In Harry Coverage

This KJR is part of our larger HBO Harry Potter coverage. The Harry Potter Season 1 Guide is the main home for everything connected to HBO’s adaptation of Philosopher’s Stone, while the Harry Potter HBO Series Guide tracks the larger reboot. You can also read our previous Harry Potter trailer review and follow the ongoing conversation through The Potterverse: Harry Potter Podcast.

Paapa Essiedu Can Play A Snape We Already Understand

Let’s deal with Alan Rickman first, because every conversation about a new Severus Snape eventually crashes into him. Rickman is unassailable in the role. His voice, physical control, humor, cruelty and sadness became so deeply associated with Snape that it is nearly impossible to imagine the character without hearing Rickman somewhere in your head.

I also remember a time when Jack Nicholson’s Joker felt similarly definitive. Then Christopher Nolan cast Heath Ledger, everybody collectively lost their minds, and Ledger eventually proved that an iconic performance does not have to become a permanent template for every actor who follows it. Another performer can approach the same character from a completely different dramatic direction and create something worthwhile precisely because the interpretation is different.

I am not predicting Paapa Essiedu will become Snape’s Heath Ledger. That would be an insane expectation to place on anybody before we have watched a single episode. The useful lesson is that Essiedu gains far more by finding his own dramatic logic than he ever could by reproducing Rickman’s pauses, cadence or physical stillness.

HBO has given him an especially interesting way to do that because the cultural relationship with Snape has completely changed. Harry walks into Potions and encounters a professor who seems to dislike him immediately. Snape humiliates him, needles him and appears oddly invested in proving that the famous Harry Potter is nowhere near as impressive as everyone believes. From Harry’s perspective, the hostility makes no sense because he has absolutely no context for it.

The audience does. We know Snape loved Lily. We know what James represented to him. We understand that Harry enters that classroom carrying reminders of both people inside the same face, and we know that Snape’s relationship with this child will eventually contain resentment, grief, guilt, obligation, protection and love in ways Harry cannot begin to comprehend.

That gap between Harry’s knowledge and ours is dramatic irony, and this is where the new adaptation can become fascinating. When the audience knows more than the protagonist, the dramatic question changes. Harry can look across the classroom and wonder why this professor seems to hate him, while we watch the exact same scene wondering what Snape is trying not to feel.

Those two experiences can coexist without changing the plot at all. Essiedu can therefore play two scenes at once. The first belongs to Harry, where Snape is hostile, intimidating and strangely fixated on him. The second belongs to the returning audience, where every look at Harry potentially contains James, Lily and years of emotional damage that Snape has spent most of his adult life trying to control.

That is where performance, directing and editing can do an enormous amount of work. What happens in Snape’s face the first time he really sees Harry? Does his attention stay on him slightly longer than the situation requires? Does irritation arrive quickly because something more vulnerable appeared first? Does Harry occasionally behave in a way that reminds Snape of James, while another moment catches him completely off guard because he suddenly sees Lily?

The trick will be restraint. I do not need mournful music whenever Snape notices Harry’s eyes, and I certainly do not need obvious visual winks announcing a reveal that is still years away for Harry. A look held half a beat too long can be enough. So can an editorial decision to remain with Snape after Harry walks out of the room, or a moment when an emotion briefly appears before Snape suppresses it.

A new viewer should be able to read the behavior as hostility. A longtime Potter fan should be able to see the contradiction underneath it. That is where this Snape can become his own character.

HBO Already Knows The Ending — And So Do We

The Snape idea gets me excited because it points toward a much larger adaptation philosophy. For years, the most obvious argument for HBO’s version has been runtime: the books contain characters, relationships, classes and subplots the films had to compress, and television gives the writers more room to restore them.

That absolutely matters. Our piece on what a faithful Harry Potter adaptation actually means gets into why restored material becomes valuable when it preserves the emotional and dramatic function of the books rather than simply checking missing scenes off a list.

Audience foreknowledge may be even more interesting. HBO gets to make the beginning while knowing exactly how the ending changes our understanding of it, and a huge percentage of the audience carries that same knowledge into the show. The writers know what Snape means. They know what Dumbledore is hiding. They know where Harry’s ideas about choice, sacrifice, blood, prophecy and death are eventually going.

That creates an opportunity for retrospective construction. A gesture in Season 1 can acquire completely different emotional weight in Season 7. A conversation can initially play as ordinary and become devastating once later information changes its context. A character can tell Harry one thing while performance or staging quietly allows the audience to recognize something Harry cannot yet interpret.

The first-time viewer still matters enormously. Harry’s point of view has to organize the experience, and somebody discovering this world for the first time should be able to follow every mystery without arriving with seven novels worth of background information. The richer version simply allows the same scene to operate at different depths depending on what the viewer knows.

A first-time viewer can see Snape as suspicious while a returning viewer watches tragedy developing years before Harry has language for it. That is much more interesting than using eight hours to announce that Peeves finally made the cut.

It also gives HBO a creative answer to the problem of familiarity. The series cannot recreate the cultural experience of discovering Harry Potter when the books and movies were new because that experience is gone. The major secrets have been absorbed into popular culture. The show can create a different experience based on what we know now.

That is also what makes the broader Harry Potter trailer adaptation strategy worth watching. HBO has to treat familiarity as part of the storytelling environment rather than an obstacle it wishes would disappear.

Harry Still Has To Discover Who Harry Potter Is

The trailer’s strongest Harry line fits beautifully inside that approach because he admits, “Everyone thinks I’m this great wizard, but I don’t really know anything.” That gets directly underneath Harry’s character problem because everybody knows Harry Potter except Harry Potter.

The Dursleys have spent eleven years telling this child that he is strange, troublesome and barely worthy of taking up space in their home. Hagrid then opens the door to the Wizarding World and Harry discovers the opposite problem. Complete strangers know his name, stare at his scar and treat him as somebody extraordinary before he has performed a single spell.


UNLOCK BONUS EPISODES, PREMIUM PODCASTS & MORE    Join The #NerdClan

Neither version tells Harry very much about himself. That gives the first season a strong character spine because Harry has to begin participating in the creation of his own identity. His immediate desires are easy to understand: he wants friends, wants to learn magic, wants to succeed at Hogwarts and eventually wants to understand the mystery surrounding the Philosopher’s Stone. Underneath those goals sits a deeper developmental need to discover what kind of person Harry Potter will become once other people stop making that decision for him.

The Sorting Hat becomes especially interesting through that lens. Harry sits underneath another authority that examines him and begins imagining what he might become, but this time Harry participates in the decision. He asks not to be placed in Slytherin.

That small choice plants one of the largest moral ideas in the entire franchise. Harry cannot choose his parents, his fame, his abilities, his scar or the prophecy that will eventually dominate his life. He can choose how he responds to those things.

Season 1 can develop that idea through behavior rather than speeches. Draco can offer Harry one version of himself. Ron can offer another. Quidditch can give Harry confidence based on something he actually does rather than something strangers assume about him. Snape can attack his fear that the legend of Harry Potter is much more impressive than the actual boy.

That last connection is why Snape’s line in this trailer works so well for me. Harry has already admitted that he fears he knows almost nothing, and Snape immediately presses against that insecurity by mocking his ability. A useful antagonist puts pressure on a weakness that already exists inside the protagonist, and Snape knows exactly where Harry is vulnerable.

For Harry, that pressure is about living up to a reputation. For the audience, it carries another emotional layer because we know Snape is reacting to much more than Harry’s performance in Potions. HBO can use our knowledge without giving it to Harry, and that balance is crucial.

Television Can Make Hogwarts Feel Like Harry’s Life

The other major opportunity in this trailer is much quieter, and I actually think the footage of Harry and Ron screwing around in the Gryffindor dormitory may be more important than the troll.

Television can accumulate ordinary behavior until the ordinary becomes emotionally valuable. Give me breakfasts, classes, homework, conversations before bed, minor arguments and nights where nobody is trying to solve the mystery of the Philosopher’s Stone. Those scenes still need dramatic purpose, but the change inside them can be small because television allows small changes to build on one another.

One breakfast between Harry and Ron is just a scene. Twenty breakfasts can create the feeling of a friendship. One night in Gryffindor Tower establishes a location. A season of Harry sleeping, laughing, studying and fighting there can turn that same room into his bedroom.

That accumulation is central to Sorcerer’s Stone because this is the story of a neglected child discovering somewhere he belongs. Our Harry Potter Episode 1 analysis keeps coming back to that basic requirement: Hogwarts only becomes emotionally powerful if the story first makes us understand why Harry needs it.

The warmer visual language in this trailer helps. Hogwarts should be inviting enough that Harry’s attachment feels inevitable. The candles, food, crowded tables, common rooms, stone corridors and general chaos of school life create a world that feels abundant after the emotional starvation of Privet Drive.

The story world itself can reflect Harry’s growth. He moves from a tightly controlled suburban house where he has literally been trained to occupy as little space as possible into a gigantic magical castle filled with rooms, staircases, ghosts, friends, teachers and mysteries. His physical environment expands while his understanding of himself expands with it.

That gives the production design a dramatic job. Hogwarts has to become valuable enough that danger inside the castle feels like a violation of something Harry trusts. The troll becomes more frightening after the school feels safe. The forbidden corridor becomes more ominous when the rest of Hogwarts feels welcoming. Voldemort eventually threatens more than Harry’s physical survival because he threatens the first world Harry has ever actively chosen to love.

This is why the additional television runtime matters. The mystery gives the season movement, while Harry’s life at Hogwarts gives that movement consequence.

The Mirror Shows The Opportunity — Dumbledore Shows The Risk

The Mirror of Erised may become the clearest test of whether HBO understands how to use that accumulation. Harry spends his first months at Hogwarts gaining things he never had before. He finds friends, receives attention from teachers, discovers Quidditch and gets a bed in a room with other children who actually want him there. He finally has a place at a table where he belongs.

Then the Mirror shows him his parents.

That scene becomes more powerful when Harry’s new happiness has been allowed to feel real. The Mirror reveals that belonging has helped him without erasing the original wound. Harry can love Hogwarts completely while still desperately wanting the family he lost.

The longer format gives HBO time to establish that new emotional equilibrium before the Mirror disrupts it. The image begins as something magical and eventually becomes painful because Harry realizes the thing he wants most is something Hogwarts cannot give him.

That is exactly how additional screen time should function. The extra scenes create emotional pressure around the famous moments rather than simply increasing the number of famous moments we get to see.

Dumbledore is where I become a little more cautious. His line to McGonagall — “We can’t protect them. We can only prepare them” — sounds terrific, and John Lithgow gives it real weight. It also raises an important question about how aggressively HBO intends to use its knowledge of the larger saga.

Dumbledore eventually becomes deeply involved in preparing Harry for what is coming, and the moral cost of that preparation becomes one of the most complicated parts of their relationship. Season 1 needs enough innocence for the later loss of that innocence to have weight. Harry should still experience Sorcerer’s Stone primarily as an eleven-year-old discovering a magical school rather than a tiny soldier entering a war everybody else already understands.

This is where the Snape model becomes the blueprint. Let the audience notice more than Harry notices. Let performances carry additional information. Let scenes gain another meaning for viewers who understand the destination. Harry should still get to be eleven.

If HBO can hold those two perspectives at once, audience foreknowledge becomes an advantage. If the show begins rushing Harry toward mythology simply because the audience already knows it, that same foreknowledge becomes a problem.

Read Next

For the larger HBO adaptation, continue with our Harry Potter Season 1 Guide and Harry Potter HBO Series Guide. The closest companion reads to this KJR are our Harry Potter trailer adaptation strategy, our breakdown of what a faithful Harry Potter adaptation actually means, and the earlier Harry Potter trailer review. You can also follow the entire conversation through The Potterverse: Harry Potter Podcast.

My Knee-Jerk Reaction

I came away from this trailer considerably more interested in HBO’s Harry Potter, and Paapa Essiedu’s Snape is the biggest reason why. The warmer Hogwarts works for me, Harry’s uncertainty gives the first season a strong character spine, and the ordinary school-life footage suggests HBO understands how television can use accumulation to turn Hogwarts into Harry’s home.

Snape reveals something more fundamental about why experiencing this story again might actually be worthwhile. HBO gets to tell Harry Potter after we already know its secrets, which means Essiedu does not have to compete with Alan Rickman by discovering another way to sneer across a Potions classroom. He can build his performance around everything Harry cannot see yet: Lily, James, grief, resentment, guilt, love and the exhausting effort required to keep all of those feelings buried.

Harry can still wonder why Severus Snape hates him while we watch the same scene knowing that hate is nowhere close to the whole story. If HBO can build that kind of dramatic irony into Snape from the beginning and apply the same thinking to Harry, Dumbledore, Hogwarts and the rest of this world, familiarity becomes one of the adaptation’s greatest tools.

The original Harry Potter asked us to discover its secrets. This version gets to show us what was always happening underneath them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *