Why Is Ultron In VisionQuest? He’s More Than Vision’s Villain
Ultron is back in VisionQuest, but Marvel appears to be using him for more than nostalgia. Here’s how Ultron helped create Vision, why he still exists…
I absolutely LOVED the first VisionQuest trailer. Not “that looks pretty good for another Marvel show.” Not “James Spader is back, so I guess I’m interested.” I mean I watched this thing and immediately felt the particular kind of excitement I have been missing from a lot of superhero television: this looks like somebody has an actual idea.
Yes, Ultron is back. Yes, JARVIS is here. Yes, there are Wanda clues, Tommy clues, strange bits of code, a digital mansion and enough background material to keep the Easter-egg industrial complex employed until October. I am extremely happy about all of that, but none of it is why this trailer really grabbed me. The smartest thing in the VisionQuest trailer is that Vision already has the memories everybody assumes he needs — and that still is not enough.
Quick answer: VisionQuest appears to be building its story around the gap between remembering a life and actually feeling that the life belongs to you. White Vision can access the history of the original Vision — Wanda, the Avengers, Mjolnir, his death, his resurrection and apparently even the family created inside the Hex — but the trailer repeatedly shows him experiencing those memories from the outside. Then Tommy enters the story and turns that identity problem into something much more painful: if Vision does not believe he is the man who raised this boy, does he still have a responsibility to become his father?
That gives the trailer its story tool: The Borrowed Life. Give a character the history, memories and relationships of a life they do not emotionally believe they lived, then force the present to demand responsibility for that life anyway. If Terry Matalas follows that argument all the way through, I am VERY in.
Following VisionQuest? This is our storycraft breakdown of the first trailer. For the release date, cast, White Vision, Ultron, Tommy and all of our continuing coverage, start with our VisionQuest Marvel Guide →
Spoiler note: This trailer review discusses the ending of WandaVision, Agatha All Along, Avengers: Age of Ultron, Infinity War and the publicly released VisionQuest trailer.
The Borrowed Life is a character problem created when somebody receives the history of a person they do not fully believe themselves to be. The memories may be accurate, the relationships may have happened and other people may recognize the character as the same person, but internally there is still a disconnect between knowing what happened and feeling ownership over what happened.
That is much more interesting than amnesia. Amnesia asks, “What happened to me?” and the answer can theoretically be supplied through information: find the file, watch the video, meet somebody from your past, recover the memory. VisionQuest appears to be asking something harder: What if I know exactly what happened to me and still don’t believe the person in those memories is me? Information cannot solve that. Character has to.
This distinction matters because WandaVision already gave White Vision the obvious thing a lesser sequel could spend an entire season chasing. During the finale, Wanda’s Vision and White Vision stop beating the hell out of each other long enough to have one of the most wonderfully nerdy conversations Marvel has ever put on screen: the Ship of Theseus.
If every plank of a ship is gradually replaced, is it still the same ship? If the removed planks are reconstructed into another ship, which one is the original? The question becomes the perfect way for the two Visions to examine themselves because neither can comfortably claim to be the complete original. Wanda’s Vision has the personality and emotional continuity created inside the Hex but not the original physical body; White Vision has the reconstructed body but initially lacks access to the memories that shaped the person who lived inside it.
Then Wanda’s Vision restores those memories. White Vision remembers and leaves. That ending is why I am so encouraged by this trailer. Matalas does not appear interested in spending eight episodes pretending the previous show never solved that problem. White Vision does not need a scavenger hunt to recover his data. He needs to figure out what the data means.
The trailer begins in a wonderfully ordinary place: a pub where Vision apparently once spent time with Wanda. Someone remembers him coming in with “that redhead,” and the environment contains physical evidence of a relationship Vision can intellectually recognize even if he does not emotionally experience it as his own.
Think about how strange that is from his perspective. Somebody can point to a place and essentially say, “You were happy here. You loved someone here. You built memories here.” Vision has access to the corresponding information and can presumably verify that all of it is true, but verification is not the same thing as missing Wanda. That is the first proof of The Borrowed Life: the world remembers Vision before Vision knows how to belong to the memories the world keeps handing back to him.
Then comes the brutal little question about whether anyone is waiting for him tonight. The answer is no. His past contains a home; his present contains himself.
The imagery becomes even more interesting when Vision retreats into what appears to be an enormous internal digital home populated by the artificial intelligences connected to his existence. JARVIS, FRIDAY, Ultron and the others are not simply Marvel cameos wandering through a cool virtual set. They appear to be part of the architecture Vision uses to understand himself, which makes his statement that “home is just me” feel especially important.
WandaVision was built around Wanda’s inability to survive the loss of home. She and Vision planned a life together in Westview, and when grief becomes unbearable she creates an external reality capable of giving that life back to her. The sitcom house is artificial, but the emotional desire underneath it is painfully real.
Now Vision appears to be doing almost the inverse. Wanda built an artificial world outside herself because the feelings were too powerful to contain; Vision builds an artificial world inside himself because he possesses the memories but cannot access the feelings that gave them meaning. Same family. Opposite problem. That is the kind of sequel construction I want: do not repeat the original show’s trick because people liked it; reverse the pressure and make the continuation reveal something new.
Then we get the image that really sold the whole idea for me: Vision watching his previous life in a movie theater. That choice literalizes his emotional condition. Vision is not positioned inside the memory; he is sitting in a seat watching Vision perform heroic acts on a screen. He has become the audience of his own life.
The trailer specifically shows him watching the original Vision wield Mjolnir during Avengers: Age of Ultron, and I cannot think of a better memory to choose. Nobody knew whether Vision could be trusted when he was first created. Ultron had designed the body, Tony and Bruce were involved with the intelligence, Thor helped complete the process and the Avengers had every reason to wonder what the hell they had just brought to life. Then Vision casually lifts Mjolnir, and the movie uses the MCU’s clearest shorthand for worthiness to tell everyone in the room that this being can be trusted.
But that is precisely why White Vision watching the moment on a screen is more interesting than simply remembering it. He can look at objective evidence that says Vision was worthy. He can watch himself lift the hammer, fight Ultron and make heroic decisions, but none of that automatically means he experiences the virtue as his own. The trailer practically says it out loud: he has the face, the name and the memories, but questions whether he possesses the virtue of the man he is watching.
That is the difference between a résumé and an identity. You can inherit somebody’s résumé. You cannot inherit the choices that made it true.
This is where the title VisionQuest starts doing more work than simply referencing the comics. The quest does not appear to be about retrieving a missing piece of information because Vision seems surrounded by information. His entire mind is practically an archive.
The actual quest is interpretation. Why did this person love Wanda? Why was he worthy of Mjolnir? Why did he choose the Avengers instead of Ultron? Why did he believe human life was worth protecting? Why did he sacrifice himself? Why did a family created inside an impossible reality matter if that reality eventually disappeared? Those are not database questions. They require Vision to decide which values contained in those memories he will choose again.
This is why I am delighted James Spader is returning without being especially interested in “HOW IS ULTRON ALIVE?!?!?” as the main question. I want the mechanical answer too, but the far more interesting thing is that Ultron appears to live inside Vision’s head while Vision is trying to determine which parts of his inherited identity actually belong to him.
Ultron did not merely fight Vision. He helped create the conditions for Vision to exist in the first place. He designed the body for himself, JARVIS becomes part of the intelligence placed inside that body, the Mind Stone helps complete the process, Thor supplies the lightning and the result becomes a being who immediately rejects the worldview of his creator. Vision is therefore not simply carrying an old villain around inside his mental attic. He is carrying a parent.
Go back to Age of Ultron and look at the philosophical split between them. Ultron absorbs humanity’s violence, contradiction and self-destruction and concludes that humanity should be replaced. Vision looks at the same species and arrives at almost the opposite response: human beings are flawed, temporary and capable of terrible things, but Vision still chooses them.
That is why the final exchange between Vision and Ultron works so beautifully in that movie. Vision does not defeat Ultron by pretending humanity is secretly perfect; he acknowledges humanity’s failures and still sees value in its impermanence. Now put Ultron inside the head of a Vision who no longer feels connected to the emotional experiences that produced that philosophy. White Vision can remember rejecting Ultron, but can he explain why he should reject him again?
I was already predisposed to be excited about VisionQuest because Terry Matalas is running the show. I absolutely LOVED what he did with Star Trek: Picard Season 3, and not simply because he reunited the Next Generation cast and let us see the Enterprise-D again. The thing that worked for me about that season was that Matalas usually understood the difference between recognition and dramatic use.
Yes, the nostalgia was everywhere, but the best nostalgia created unfinished business. Picard does not merely reunite with Beverly Crusher because the audience remembers Beverly Crusher; their shared past walks into the story in the form of Jack Crusher, the adult son Picard never knew existed. Suddenly decades of history become present-tense responsibility. Legacy stops being fan-service wallpaper and becomes fatherhood, regret and choice.
Now look at what VisionQuest gives Matalas: a legacy character carrying enormous history, a man disconnected from that history and a son. That is why his involvement is more than a name in the credits for me. He has already shown an interest in making old continuity create new responsibility instead of merely triggering applause.
This is where I think the trailer stops being a clever identity puzzle and reveals the thing that could make the show genuinely hurt. Tommy exists, which means Vision does not get to solve his Ship of Theseus problem alone in a room.
Inside WandaVision, Wanda and Vision raise Billy and Tommy as their sons. The circumstances of their creation are bizarre because everything about the Hex is bizarre, but the emotional relationship is not treated as meaningless. Wanda loves them. Vision parents them. The boys experience him as their father.
White Vision can dismiss all of that intellectually if he wants. The family was created inside an artificial reality. He was not physically the Vision living there. Those memories were transferred to him, and he did not subjectively experience the moments as they happened. Fine. Then Tommy stands in front of him.
This is the move I want VisionQuest to make more than anything else. The Ship of Theseus is a fascinating philosophical question because it asks what creates continuity of identity when the components of something change, but philosophy remains wonderfully comfortable when everybody involved is hypothetical.
Tommy removes that comfort because Vision’s identity suddenly has consequences for somebody besides Vision. If Tommy remembers Vision as his father, what does Vision owe him? Does Vision get to say, “Technically, that wasn’t me”? If the memories of loving Tommy exist inside him, does responsibility travel with those memories? If he does not feel paternal love yet, does that mean the relationship was false, or does it mean he has to choose whether to build the relationship again?
The show takes the question from “Am I Vision?” to “What do I owe the people Vision loved?” That is a television series.
One of the trailer’s most intriguing exchanges has Vision questioning the reality of the family created inside the Hex, only to have that certainty challenged. This is exactly where I want the show’s dramatic pressure to live because Vision has a perfectly reasonable intellectual defense available to him. The Westview family did not exist under ordinary circumstances, the twins were born inside a reality Wanda created and the Vision who parented them disappeared when the Hex came down.
Therefore: not real. Case closed.
Except stories do not measure reality exclusively through physical permanence. Was Vision’s love for Wanda inside the Hex unreal because the body disappeared? Was Tommy’s experience of having a father unreal because the circumstances of his existence were magical? Was the original Vision’s sacrifice meaningless because somebody later reconstructed his body?
Marvel has already spent multiple stories making those distinctions messy. VisionQuest now has the chance to make the mess Vision’s responsibility.
Then you notice how elegantly the family structure can stack: Ultron → Vision → Tommy. Creator, creation, child. Vision is trying to determine whether he can become a father while literally carrying one of the most catastrophic father figures imaginable inside his head.
That creates a very simple dramatic question underneath all the sci-fi architecture: Can someone inherit damage without passing it down? Ultron creates Vision for his own purposes, Vision rejects that purpose and becomes something better, and now Tommy enters Vision’s life with his own fractured continuity and need for family.
Vision can repeat the structure of his “father” by treating the child as a function of what Vision needs, or he can break it. That is the kind of intergenerational story that makes bringing Ultron back dramatically necessary instead of merely cool.
The mansion inside Vision’s mind appears populated by artificial intelligences connected to Tony Stark and Vision’s creation: JARVIS, FRIDAY, Ultron and others. That immediately gives the show a visual identity, which I LOVE. It looks colorful, tactile, strange and purpose-built rather than like another group of superheroes standing in a gray room explaining the next piece of MCU business.
More importantly, every room can potentially externalize part of Vision’s inherited self. JARVIS represents part of the foundation from which Vision emerged, Ultron represents another creator and a road Vision rejected, the memory theater contains evidence of the heroic identity, and the mansion itself appears capable of changing and glitching as Vision’s internal state changes.
That means the production design can do what good fantasy and science-fiction production design should always do: tell us what is happening inside the character without requiring somebody to explain it.
The trailer is absolutely saturated with Wanda’s absence. The pub connects back to their relationship, the idea of home connects directly to Westview, Vision watches the family, red and white imagery keeps rubbing against each other and the music circles around the feeling of being unable to stop thinking about someone who is gone.
And yes, there is that wonderful `VSSN WN.DA 143` image that appears to combine Vision and Wanda with the old pager shorthand for “I love you.” I smiled. I am a human being with a heart. But I do not want to turn the whole article into “WANDA RETURN CONFIRMED?!?!?” because the absence is already doing enough dramatic work.
Vision does not need Wanda to physically walk through a door in Episode 1 for her to shape his story. If his problem is that he possesses memories of loving her without emotionally knowing how those memories belong to him, then Wanda is already embedded in the conflict. She is part of the borrowed life.
And, yes, eventually I obviously want Wanda and Vision back in a scene together. Come on. I’m not made of stone. But I would much rather VisionQuest earn that reunion by forcing Vision to become capable of meeting Wanda again than treat Elizabeth Olsen’s return as the thing that makes the show important. If Wanda appears before Vision has developed ownership over his identity, she can simply tell him who he used to be. If she appears after he has chosen who he is now, that’s a relationship.
The use of “Losing My Mind” is another reason the trailer feels so deliberate. The song is built around everyday life becoming haunted by the person you cannot stop thinking about, with ordinary objects and ordinary moments constantly returning the lost relationship to the foreground.
That is essentially Vision’s predicament. His internal world is filled with artifacts from a life he can access but cannot fully experience. He can see the person he loved, see the family and see the heroic moments, while every part of the archive tells him what he is supposed to feel. But data is not grief, and memory is not longing. That gap is the story.
One of my recurring frustrations with interconnected franchise storytelling is when the new story exists primarily to move pieces into position for the next story. Character A receives the object, Character B learns the name, Character C arrives through the portal, credits.
VisionQuest could easily become that kind of show because it sits at the intersection of approximately nine billion pieces of Marvel continuity: Wanda, Billy, Tommy, Ultron, Stark technology, Young Avengers and whatever larger MCU machinery eventually surrounds them. But this trailer does not primarily sell me on where Vision is going next in the franchise. It sells me on what Vision needs emotionally. That difference is enormous.
If this trailer is telling the truth about the series, I don’t think VisionQuest is fundamentally about whether White Vision can become the “old” Vision again. I think that would actually be the boring answer. The old Vision is dead, Wanda’s recreated Vision disappeared with the Hex and both losses should matter. White Vision now carries memories from those lives, but simply using those memories to restore the factory settings would make the Ship of Theseus question meaningless.
The more interesting story is whether this new Vision can use inherited memory without allowing inherited identity to make every choice for him. He does not need to become the old Vision. He needs to decide which parts of that Vision are worth choosing again.
That is why I would keep watching the Mjolnir memory as the series unfolds. The old Vision lifting the hammer functions as evidence of virtue, but White Vision can watch that evidence as many times as he wants and repeating the footage does not make him worthy. A character becomes worthy by making choices.
So if VisionQuest is really doing what I hope it is doing, the season should gradually replace memory evidence with present-tense decisions. Do not merely tell me Vision was compassionate; force this Vision to choose compassion. Do not merely tell me Vision protected people; give this Vision somebody to protect. Do not merely tell me Vision loved his family; put his son in front of him.
That is why Tommy could become the most important person in the whole show. Vision can ask JARVIS about his architecture, argue with Ultron about his creation and watch old footage to understand the choices the previous Vision made. All of those tools can tell him something about his past.
Tommy asks about the future, because parenthood cannot be completed through recollection. You have to show up. The old Vision cannot do that. This one can.
The quest is not simply to retrieve missing memories, put the red costume back on or find Wanda so everything can return to normal. The quest is to take a life experienced as somebody else’s movie and make a present-tense choice inside it.
That is where memory becomes identity: not when you remember the old choice, but when you make the next one.
VisionQuest premieres October 14, 2026 on Disney+. The series is the third part of Marvel’s WandaVision trilogy after WandaVision and Agatha All Along.
That’s exactly the identity problem the new series appears interested in exploring. White Vision possesses the reconstructed physical body of the original Vision and received Vision’s memories during the WandaVision finale, but the trailer suggests he does not emotionally experience those memories as a life he personally lived.
Yes. Wanda’s Vision restored White Vision’s memories during their Ship of Theseus confrontation in the WandaVision finale. VisionQuest appears to move beyond whether he can remember those events and ask whether he can emotionally connect to them.
The trailer places Ultron among the AI personalities existing within Vision’s internal world. Beyond the mechanics of how Ultron remains present, his inclusion makes thematic sense because Ultron participated in Vision’s creation and represents an inherited worldview Vision previously rejected.
Yes. Thomas Shepherd is part of the series and appears in the trailer. His presence is especially important because it can transform Vision’s abstract identity crisis into a question of responsibility: Tommy experienced Vision as his father, even if White Vision does not yet feel ownership over those memories.
Wanda’s relationship with Vision is referenced throughout the trailer through memories, imagery and other clues, but those references should not automatically be treated as confirmation of a physical Wanda return. Her absence already appears to be a major part of Vision’s emotional problem.
At the plot level, VisionQuest follows the rebuilt Vision as he searches for meaning while interacting with AI personalities embedded within his programming and becoming connected to Thomas Shepherd. At the character level, the trailer suggests a deeper question: can Vision take responsibility for a life he remembers intellectually but does not yet experience emotionally as his own?
The trailer is only the beginning. Our VisionQuest guide tracks White Vision, Ultron, Tommy, the cast, future trailers and every piece of analysis we publish heading into the October premiere.
VisionQuest Marvel Guide • Who Is White Vision? • Why Is Ultron In VisionQuest?
Ultron is back in VisionQuest, but Marvel appears to be using him for more than nostalgia. Here’s how Ultron helped create Vision, why he still exists…
White Vision has Vision’s body and memories, but that does not automatically make him the same person. Here’s what happened to him after WandaVision, where he…
Trying to figure out what you actually need to know before VisionQuest? This is the front door to all of our coverage: White Vision, Ultron, Tommy,…
VisionQuest starts with a man surrounded by proof of a life he does not completely experience as his own. The pub remembers Wanda, the theater can show him lifting Mjolnir and his internal mansion can preserve the voices that participated in his creation. The Borrowed Life gives Vision everything he needs to know who the old Vision was while denying him the one thing an archive cannot provide: ownership.
Then Tommy changes the pressure. A memory can remain something Vision watches from a comfortable distance, but a son standing in front of him creates an obligation in the present. The question is no longer whether the old Vision really loved his family; the question is whether this Vision will choose to love the people that history has placed back in his life.
That is the larger craft lesson: backstory only becomes drama when the past demands a new choice. Memories can explain a character, but identity is created when the character decides what to do next.
A memory can tell Vision who he was. A son can force him to decide who he is.