Written by: Emem Uko
One of the highlights of season two for me was watching Claire and Fergus’ burgeoning relationship. A child who has never known a mother and a pregnant woman preparing to become a mother for the first time – what a beautifully unique and dynamic character duo for the book and show to explore! While Jamie and Murtagh provide Fergus with the ever-important male mentoring and guidance every young man needs, it’s Fergus’ relationship with Claire that most struck me. This was especially true as we reached the point in the season where the men returned to Scotland and prepared for impending battle. While watching “Je Suis Prest,” one question came to mind – why did Claire pull Fergus away from Shinty with the men, when he was clearly having fun?
We see Claire go into full-fledged panic mode in this episode, and it’s understandable. As she watches the clan men preparing for the upcoming rising, she is transported to the time she served as a British Army nurse, in World War II, and she relives memories that trouble her, even haunt her. She is reminded of the similarities of the cost of war, no matter the time period. Her mind recalls the downtime the soldiers had, as well as when they were met with their untimely deaths. The unnerving familiarity of her present moment with her past forces her to grab little Fergus away from playing. She doesn’t want history to repeat itself; she knows all too well that young soldiers can play games with each other one day, and then the next, perish on the battlefield together. Fergus is not going to meet that fate, not when she has an eye on him.
Fergus is a curious and somewhat precocious child with little to no inkling of the dangers of war. But why should he? There is an excitement in the atmosphere and he is thrilled to be witnessing the adrenaline rush of preparing for battle. But, Claire has seen young soldiers die. The chilling recount of the soldier that cried for his mother is reason enough for her to make sure that Fergus is far away from the surroundings of war.
Pulling Fergus away from creating a friendship with the men is good parenting. If these men do not return, their loss will not be as crippling as it would be if he gets close to them. If he doesn’t form close friendships with them, then there’s a chance that he wouldn’t sneak off with them to battle. Her Fergus will be safer.
We have to remember that it wasn’t long ago that Claire lost a child – she certainly isn’t going to lose another. Claire has taken Fergus under her wing, mending the void left behind from losing her baby, Faith. Recalling Reverend Graham’s advice to Frank – “children accept the world as it is presented to them” – you’re struck with how aptly that also applies here, on both accounts. To Fergus, Claire is the closest to a mother he’s ever known. And for Claire, she loves and views Fergus as her child, whether she bore him or not. Her innate motherly instinct is in overdrive when it comes to the impending war and Fergus’ well-being.
very well written..thank you
I'm glad you like it. Thanks.
I thought she always had it. Look how she was with Mary as well. Although Mary didn't live with them she did care for her like a mother. I think Claire has always had that motherly instinct, she just had all the anxieties that a mother to be has. Great read.
Thank You Emem so love the poem,so true,for me Claire is a very good mother to Fergus not quite to Mary,but also I found it unbelieveable that she left Brianna to find Jamie again I couldn't have left my child no matter how old,but then that is how it is in the book & how the story would have evolved I don't know?My own mother left me when I was 2 with wonderful uncle&aunt,it was war time also so I never could!
I like that you pointed out "the anxieties of a mother-to-be." Thanks!
Thank you so much for sharing. Yes, that was hard to reconcile. Claire definitely loved Brianna and she saw Jamie in her all the time. But she wasn't really living..not until there was a possibility that Jamie was alive. All in all, mothers make sacrifices for their children. For Claire to leave Brianna behind even though Briana wasn't a kid anymore was…selfish? brave? not right?
Thank you so much for sharing. Yes, that was hard to reconcile. Claire definitely loved Brianna and she saw Jamie in her all the time. But she wasn't really living..not until there was a possibility that Jamie was alive. All in all, mothers make sacrifices for their children. For Claire to leave Brianna behind even though Briana wasn't a kid anymore was…selfish? brave? not right?
Z and S good question as Briana wasn't a child anymore for me was very brave & a bit selfish as for me children come first,but when you look at it,it should be on equal footing with your love in a fair world!
Me agradan mucho los diferentes comentarios, pero la mayoría han dicho los niños o los hijos son primero que la pareja, estoy totalmente de acuerdo, pero siempre y cuando sean menores de edad, mientras dependan de los padres. Pero Brianna ya era una joven adulta, ella misma se lo dice a su madre quien dudaba en dejarla. Desde el punto de vista psicológico, existe un orden en el amor y la pareja, las parejas se conocen, se aman, se reproducen para dejar su descendencia, pero los hijos son prestados, tienen que vivir su propia vida, tienen que formar su hogar y tener sus hijos. Y cuando eso sucede, los padres solo se deben y se tienen uno al otro, como en un inicio, siempre serán padres y después abuelos, pero ellos deben dar ese lugar a su pareja como prioridad en el orden en el amor, porque es una lealtad, un compromiso de amor y voluntad. Para los religiosos, dice en alguna parte de la Biblia, que el hombre y la mujer dejaran a sus padres para ser uno solo. Entonces aquí es lo mismo, la única diferencia es que su lealtad y amor entre Claire y Jamie estaba separada por 200 años, con su hija ya independiente, era momento de ellos ser felices ante el sacrificio que hicieron por preservar el fruto de su amor y salvar su descendencia, viviendo 20 años de ausencia mutua. Así que en lo personal, la sociedad siempre etiqueta como una actitud egoísta a los que toman una decisión como la de Clair, haciendo caso omiso al estigma de que los hijos son primero. pero amar a tus hijos es soltarlos, dejarlos vivir, dejarlos volar sus propios cielos. En la Naturaleza, así son los animalitos, ellos preparan a sus cachorros para aprender a sobrevivir, para ser fuertes, para seguir su propio camino, pero no viven eternamente con ellos. Saludos a tod@s.
Claire had that innate motherly instinct all along which made the bond between her and Fergus so natural, Mary not so much as she was an adult. As for Brianna, Claire would never have left her if she wasn't full-grown and self-sufficient. Even then, Brianna had to talk her into leaving. Choosing to leave your children isn't an easy decision; I know this from first-hand experience when I was forced to leave mine after the divorce and I had to move to Florida (they chose their father). Sometimes mothers have no choice and I don't think Claire did either(she was on a "imposed leave of absence" from the hospital).